Authorial subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images
David Mould
Proceedings of the Workshop on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2014, pp. 49--56.
Abstract: I argue in favor of a systematic subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images. Objective measurements are hard to design, and quantitative user studies are problematic for a multiplicity of reasons. Subjective evaluations are not quantitative but are faster to conduct and offer the chance to dig into subtleties that are obscured by numerical scores. By carefully laying out the important elements of the intended image style, and then evaluating their results according to their adherence to the style, researchers can produce convincing evaluations with a manageable level of effort.
Article URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2630397.2630400
BibTeX format:
@inproceedings{10.1145-2630397.2630400,
  author = {David Mould},
  title = {Authorial subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering},
  pages = {49--56},
  year = {2014},
}
Search for more articles by David Mould.

Return to the search page.


graphbib: Powered by "bibsql" and "SQLite3."