Aesthetics of Hand-Drawn vs. Computer-Generated Stippling
Ross Maciejewski, Tobias Isenberg, William M. Andrews, David S. Ebert, Mario Costa Sousa
Workshop on Computational Aesthetics, 2007, pp. 53--56.
Abstract: Recent work in non-photorealistic rendering has produced results comparable to hand-drawn artistic images. Inspiration for such techniques has come from many traditional artistic techniques, such as pen-and-ink, to depict tone, depth, and shape. These techniques can create visually appealing images and increase understanding as is evident in their use in medical textbooks, popular science, etc. However, when computer-generated images are visually compared to similar hand-drawn images, studies have shown that subjects are generally able to determine differences between both images. This seems to indicate that there are different aesthetics associated with computer-generated images and hand-drawn images. This paper discusses the implications of varying aesthetics amongst hand-drawn and computer-generated images, focusing particularly on the application of stippling to provide tone and shape to an image.
Article URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/COMPAESTH/COMPAESTH07/053-056
BibTeX format:
@inproceedings{Maciejewski:2007:AOH,
  author = {Ross Maciejewski and Tobias Isenberg and William M. Andrews and David S. Ebert and Mario Costa Sousa},
  title = {Aesthetics of Hand-Drawn vs. Computer-Generated Stippling},
  booktitle = {Workshop on Computational Aesthetics},
  pages = {53--56},
  year = {2007},
}
Search for more articles by Ross Maciejewski.
Search for more articles by Tobias Isenberg.
Search for more articles by William M. Andrews.
Search for more articles by David S. Ebert.
Search for more articles by Mario Costa Sousa.

Return to the search page.


graphbib: Powered by "bibsql" and "SQLite3."